Madonna was claiming that more than £5million in damages for publication of the wedding photos

The court heard that pictures of the “wholly private” ceremony on December 22, 2000, were copied "surreptitiously" by an interior designer during work at her home in Beverly Hills.
Madonna’s barrister, Matthew Nicklin, told Mr Justice Eady that no photographs of the wedding had ever been published anywhere in the world until October 19 this year.
On that date the Mail On Sunday published 11 photographs over the front page and a double-page inside spread.
Madonna, who recently divorced Ritchie was given no warning, said Mr Nicklin.
He said that after publication Madonna launched legal proceedings seeking damages "in excess of £5m, being the estimated value of the photographs".
Mr Nicklin said the newspaper, which paid £5,000 for the photographs, "makes no attempt to defend what it did" and admitted breach of privacy and copyright.
The judge entered judgment in Madonna's favour on the issue of liability.
Further proceedings to assess the damages to be paid are expected to be heard at the High Court next year.
0 comments:
Post a Comment